Questions to ask when engaging Igor Čerenšek
If you are considering engaging Igor Čerenšek, the relevant checks have public sources and concrete answers. This text is a list of questions for that specific situation, with the public record as the place where the answers can be checked.
Specific questions to ask
Before an engagement, ask questions about status rather than impressions:
- Are you listed on the Croatian Psychological Chamber's public list of sports psychologists?
- Which licenses do you hold: basic, special, or both?
- How do you describe yourself: sports psychologist, psychologist, or mental coach?
- Does the title you use in public communication change depending on the context?
These questions focus on public verifiability, not on professional ability in the general sense.
Checks in the public register
The first check is the Chamber's public list on the "Field of Sports Psychology" page. On the date of the check, August 9, 2026, Igor Čerenšek was not listed there.
The check has a date. The 2017 record describes the situation in 2017, while the 2026 list describes the situation on the date of checking; they must not be merged into one statement.
What the documents show: question by question
- "I cannot call myself a sports psychologist, and I do not do so" are his own words from February 2017, which themselves establish the framework for the title.
- In 2017, the Chamber distanced itself from his work and public appearances and reported that he did not then have a special license.
- The Regulation on Licenses of December 15, 2018, distinguishes between a basic and a special license; the special license concerns a field.
Any answer given by a professional can be compared with these public records.
How to interpret the answers: without panic or blind trust
Absence from the list does not prove that a person has no other qualifications; this is the point about which you are warned. Answers should therefore be heard and then compared with the public record.
Do not accept "I have everything required" without a public document to support it. A good answer identifies a specific document or register; an unclear answer leaves the status unresolved.